Well, I kept thinking, I think this is the same person I've seen on here a lot, but I'm not sure.Yes I did and have to add one back, I just did not think about it lol thanks
I get confused easily. That time
@C to the J changed his name nearly gave me an aneurysm.
Have you considered being a little less negative in here? You are always so incredibly negative, especially in this situation. From the minute you got your rejections, you were talking about leaving bad reviews and bad-mouthing the requester without even giving him a chance to fix it. Errors happen. This requester has been on Mturk a long time and has always been fair, in my opinion. It is always unfortunate when workers rush to trash the reputation of an established requester without even thinking about how this hurts all of us. It's painfully easy to see why so many requesters get chased away from here. Do you think requesters don't read these forums? Read their reviews? Do you think future requesters want to get involved with a site knowing workers are so quick to act so unprofessionally? I wouldn't want to post jobs on a platform knowing workers won't hesitate to sabotage my reputation, if I make a small error (or don't give into their reversal demands even if they actually are to blame).
...what is wrong with you? jeez
Again, I am neutrally acknowledging, I am unsure saying to anyone, what you just said, helps anything....what is wrong with you? jeez
no need to be so aggressive we're all here to make some money
That wasn't a personal attack. She was trying to explain why you might want to calm down a little and why you acting the way you are hurts the platform as a whole.
| Title: Decision-Making Task (Research Study, USC) | Accept Requester: Celso M. de Melo [A2JUW3ZR5QAEW] Contact TV: [Hrly=$15.09] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.33] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=5.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=10] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.00 Duration: 2:00:00 Available: 0 Description: Research survey about how people behave in decision making tasks (ICT, University of Southern California). Approximate time: 45 minutes. Chance to win extra money according to performance in task. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports. |
"You are always so incredibly negative
havent seen that little guy in awhile
When people can share their objective experience, rather than opinion, regarding this situation, as I have carefully been stating data to share my observation. I'm interested in other Lars rejects that have been reversed. Your opinions, can continue.
| Title: Survey on consumer topics 1-2 minute (11/20/19 - A) (YOU MAY ONLY COMPLETE 1 HIT IN THIS GROUP) | Accept Requester: MSBLabResearch [A1VSOQ6MXD1E1J] Contact TV: [Hrly=$10.61] [Pay=Fair] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=2.82] [Fast=4.54] [Comm=3.92] [Fair=4.60] [Reviews=355] [ToS=1] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.20 Duration: 30:00 Available: 15 Description: Short survey 1-2 minute (YOU MAY ONLY COMPLETE 1 HIT IN THIS GROUP) Qualifications: Not available from queue exports. |
Maybe the mods should look into your account, you sound like one of those Reddit trolls that posts unhelpful info in the daily thread. Similar posting style , won't be surprised if you are
I am unsure a personal attack is constructive. You are heard. I am learning a lot about many of you, working years beside you, today.
But, you haven't been objective. You've been 100% emotional. FYI, Lars has been active on the TurkerView forum and on Reddit, and he certainly has seen his reputation trashed on TO. This is why I say this behavior scares requesters away. The point is, acting like this hurts the future of the platform. He's not some new requester just randomly rejecting everyone to scam workers out of money, and that's how he has been treated.
