Political Stuff

Metallica

Never free, never me
Mentor
Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
5,191
Reaction score
13,922
Points
1,113
Age
29
Gender
Male
Thank God that we have a great and an amazing President,who is the most effective,trying tirelessly to rebuild America despite the obstacles from the left who is trying viciously and constantly to undermine his accomplishments.Donal J. Trump is one of the best in the modern history and capable to do the impossible.America is standing strong behind the President at any time.I will definitely vote for him again ❤❤
Top comment on a Fox News post about Trump agreeing to temporarily end the shutdown without wall funding. Yeah... weren't they just going on last week about how Trump needs the wall and they stand behind the shutdown until he gets the money?
 

Peachy

Real Southern Comfort
Pollster
Crowd Pleaser
Champion
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
30,711
Reaction score
82,088
Points
2,089
Age
30
Peachy @PeachyRider Ok here are a few of my friend's poems - He is in his 60s and writes 3-4 a week at least, very au courant.

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!
these are nice
i like how he links each one to an actual news link
does he have a blog/website of his own?
 

Sondi

Goddess of soup
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
8,919
Reaction score
33,405
Points
1,213
Age
29
Gender
Female
these are nice
i like how he links each one to an actual news link
does he have a blog/website of his own?
Me too - he's very prolific. I wish he had a blog so I could share them more easily! He just posts 'em on Facebook.
 

jan

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
12,023
Reaction score
25,418
Points
1,463
Gender
Female
Senate Republicans appear to be in a panic about President Trump’s threat to declare a national emergency to realize his unquenchable fantasy of a big, beautiful wall on the southern border. Republicans are reportedly worried that such a move could divide them, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has delivered that warning to Trump in private conversations.

Republicans have good reason to be deeply nervous. Here’s why: According to one of the country’s leading experts on national emergencies, it appears that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) can trigger a process that could require the GOP-controlled Senate to hold a vote on such a declaration by Trump — which would put Senate Republicans in a horrible political position.
.
.
.
Elizabeth Goitein, who has researched this topic extensively for the Brennan Center for Justice, tells me that if Pelosi exercises this option, it will ultimately require the Senate to vote on it in some form as well. The NEA stipulates that if one chamber (Pelosi’s House) passes such a resolution, which it easily could do, the other (McConnell’s Senate) must act on it within a very short time period — forcing GOP senators to choose whether to support it.

Alternatively, Goitein notes, the Senate could vote not to consider that resolution or change its rules to avoid such a vote. But in those scenarios, the Senate would, in effect, be voting to greenlight Trump’s emergency declaration.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/02/04/if-trump-declares-national-emergency-pelosi-can-jam-republicans-heres-how/?utm_term=.ff0cdaf2bb40
 

DCI

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
4,663
Points
513
Age
41
Location
212
Gender
Male
Senate Republicans appear to be in a panic about President Trump’s threat to declare a national emergency to realize his unquenchable fantasy of a big, beautiful wall on the southern border. Republicans are reportedly worried that such a move could divide them, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has delivered that warning to Trump in private conversations.

Republicans have good reason to be deeply nervous. Here’s why: According to one of the country’s leading experts on national emergencies, it appears that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) can trigger a process that could require the GOP-controlled Senate to hold a vote on such a declaration by Trump — which would put Senate Republicans in a horrible political position.
.
.
.
Elizabeth Goitein, who has researched this topic extensively for the Brennan Center for Justice, tells me that if Pelosi exercises this option, it will ultimately require the Senate to vote on it in some form as well. The NEA stipulates that if one chamber (Pelosi’s House) passes such a resolution, which it easily could do, the other (McConnell’s Senate) must act on it within a very short time period — forcing GOP senators to choose whether to support it.

Alternatively, Goitein notes, the Senate could vote not to consider that resolution or change its rules to avoid such a vote. But in those scenarios, the Senate would, in effect, be voting to greenlight Trump’s emergency declaration.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/02/04/if-trump-declares-national-emergency-pelosi-can-jam-republicans-heres-how/?utm_term=.ff0cdaf2bb40
I'm not so sure that it isn't a good thing if he does it. The National Emergencies Act is stupid and should be scrapped or reformed, and this is almost a perfect situation to get that ball rolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jklmnop and jan

cassius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,280
Reaction score
7,740
Points
813
  • Like
Reactions: jan

cassius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,280
Reaction score
7,740
Points
813
That would depend on one's attitude and approach to what constitutes "truth" and reliability. ChristopherASA @ChristopherASA
Just wondering if you felt that way when it was anthony weiner?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChristopherASA

ChristopherASA

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
10,974
Reaction score
20,731
Points
1,238
Age
71
Location
Wish it were Seattle,but it isn't. :(
Gender
Male
That would depend on one's attitude and approach to what constitutes "truth" and reliability. ChristopherASA @ChristopherASA
Just wondering if you felt that way when it was anthony weiner?
I apologize for kinda of jumping on you on the thread: I didn't understand what you were trying to convey. My sincere apologies.

I'm something of a nut about accuracy in reporting, regardless the type of media. I even question my own beliefs and premises. I work at it. And I'm not even sure if this is an answer to your question. :)
 

cassius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,280
Reaction score
7,740
Points
813
I apologize for kinda of jumping on you on the thread: I didn't understand what you were trying to convey. My sincere apologies.

I'm something of a nut about accuracy in reporting, regardless the type of media. I even question my own beliefs and premises. I work at it. And I'm not even sure if this is an answer to your question. :)
accepted.:blackeye: i didn't realize i had to be a mod to reply to something that i took political in the political thread. if i replied that way in the other thread they would have told me to move it.:)
 

ChristopherASA

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
10,974
Reaction score
20,731
Points
1,238
Age
71
Location
Wish it were Seattle,but it isn't. :(
Gender
Male
You took something to be political when it, in fact, wasn't.(and wasn't intended to be), unless you believe that everything dealing with honesty and accuracy is inherently "political."