Some Kind of Sneaky Witch Thief
- Jan 12, 2016
- Reaction score
Who are the WARlords?WARLords...
This will leave us 9 to 7 again. So you know the drill. Time for more team shuffling!
Right. And, like, I'm not going to apologize that we keep winning because we've kind of been busting our asses to do so. But if we win, we shouldn't be penalized by losing a member.Well heck. I mean... yay, victory, but if even-ness is so important to the process, why don't both teams just eliminate 1 person every week? That's the way it works out anyway, if you keep doing double eliminations and then passing the savings on to the winning team.
Who are the WARlords?
Also, is there a reason we're doing two eliminations at a time, instead of letting the numbers dwindle naturally? Why do the teams have to have an even number?
There's not much incentive to win, we lose someone anyway.
WARJLords...This is it, exactly. Like, "yay, we won! Fuck, we're still being punished for winning."
Right, and I get this. But in the actual game (as in, the show), there have been many times where teams kept losing and being forced to go to council until there were only one or two people left on that team. I'm not sure I understand why we have to send one person over each time we win instead of reshuffling the teams completely (which happens frequently in the form of blindly choosing new buffs to make new teams out of the old).Teams get shuffled all the time in these games. That's the nature of them, seeing as once we get to 9 players, there will not be any more team challenges. The winning team does not have to vote someone off so as they wouldn't win the prizes anymore. They just voting a team shuffle.